Health Numbers

Waist-to-Height Ratio Calculator

A better predictor of cardiovascular risk than BMI. Keep your waist to less than half your height.

Waist unit
Height unit
in
ft
in

WHtR Results for Men

The table below categorises the ratios and provides a description of each category for men.

WHtRRatioDescription
< 35%< 0.35Underweight
35 – 43%0.35 – 0.43Healthy: Slim
43 – 53%0.43 – 0.53Healthy
53 – 58%0.53 – 0.58Overweight
58 – 63%0.58 – 0.63Seriously Overweight
> 63%> 0.63Morbidly Obese

How to Determine Your WHtR

First, measure your waist size with a tape measure at the belly button. Do not measure your waist where your pants sit — this area is often smaller than your true waist. It is important to actually measure your waist size and not rely on your pant size. Many clothing manufacturers make their sizes larger than stated on the label to avoid offending customers.

Divide your waist (in any unit) by your height in the same unit. The resulting number is your WHtR. A value under 0.50 means your waist is less than half your height — the key boundary for healthy risk.

BMI vs. Waist-to-Height Ratio

BMI is generally more well known than the waist-to-height ratio for measuring body composition. Nevertheless, many physicians believe WHtR to be the superior measure. This is because BMI can be skewed by an individual's frame or quantity of muscle mass — the WHtR is a far better measure for anyone with significant muscle mass.

The European Congress on Obesity has stated that WHtR is the best way to predict a person's risk of serious health problems such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease.

Unlike BMI, the WHtR is based on waist size — the most dangerous place to carry weight. Abdominal fat affects organs like the heart, liver, and kidneys far more adversely than fat around the hips and bottom in terms of cardiometabolic risk.

BMI Limitations
  • Doesn't distinguish muscle from fat
  • Skewed by frame size
  • Misclassifies muscular men as overweight
  • Ignores fat distribution
WHtR Advantages
  • Directly measures abdominal fat
  • Simple & universal boundary (0.50)
  • Not skewed by muscle mass
  • Better predictor of cardiometabolic risk

Frequently Asked Questions